MOTION OR WRIT DENIED Sep. 27, 2007: Opinion by Justice Puryear (Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton)
03-07-00520-CV
In re James Lee Cinnamon--Appeal from 119th District Court of Concho CountyORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM CONCHO COUNTY
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
__________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton
Filed: September 27, 2007
Showing posts with label Puryear denials. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Puryear denials. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 2, 2007
Monday, August 13, 2007
Nunc pro tunc attack on judgment following unsuccessful appeal rejected
In re Charles Flentroy, No. 03-07-00262-CV (Tex.App.- Austin, Aug. 13, 2007)(Opinion by Justice Puryear)(Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Henson)(mandamus denial)
Appeal from 403rd District Court of Travis County
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Charles Flentroy has petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus to compel the district court to act on his motion for a judgment nunc pro tunc in local cause number 3013664. Flentroy seeks to have a deadly weapon finding removed from the judgment. Flentroy's challenge to this finding was rejected on direct appeal. See Flentroy v. State, No. 03-02-00624-CR (Tex. App.--Austin Aug. 25, 2005, no pet.) (opinion on remand). The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
__________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Henson
Filed: August 13, 2007
Appeal from 403rd District Court of Travis County
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Charles Flentroy has petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus to compel the district court to act on his motion for a judgment nunc pro tunc in local cause number 3013664. Flentroy seeks to have a deadly weapon finding removed from the judgment. Flentroy's challenge to this finding was rejected on direct appeal. See Flentroy v. State, No. 03-02-00624-CR (Tex. App.--Austin Aug. 25, 2005, no pet.) (opinion on remand). The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
__________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Henson
Filed: August 13, 2007
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)