Comment: Other appellate courts in the state explain why mandamus is denied, or at least what kind of relief was sought against a trial court judge. There appear to be differing concepts of judicial efficiency and of the need to explain - to litigants, to lawyers, and to the public at large - why appellate courts rule the way they do.
January 23, 2008
Civil Causes Decided:
MOTION OR WRIT DENIED: Opinion by Chief Justice Law (Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop)
03-07-00706-CV
In re Charles Anderson Gunn
Appeal from 147th District Court of Travis County
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
__________________________________________
W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop
Filed: January 23, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment